Classification target LinkedIn Zip #469. Grid 6×6. Checkpoint count 13. Wall sample 0. Pattern tag: checkpoint-cluster board. Segment vector: 1→2 (3 cells), 2→3 (3 cells), 3→4 (5 cells), 4→5 (2 cells), 5→6 (2 cells), 6→7 (13 cells), 7→8 (4 cells), 8→9 (3 cells), 9→10 (5 cells), 10→11 (3 cells), 11→12 (2 cells), 12→13 (2 cells).
Board spotlight: Checkpoints sit close together on the grid — short numbered hops still need full-cell coverage between them without revisiting squares. Wall count 0 on 6×6 shapes which corridors stay open between numbered cells.
Sample segment 1: 1→2. Length 3. Walls crossed: 0.
Sample segment 2: 2→3. Length 3. Walls crossed: 0.
Sample segment 3: 3→4. Length 5. Walls crossed: 0.
Sample segment 4: 4→5. Length 2. Walls crossed: 0.
Sample segment 5: 5→6. Length 2. Walls crossed: 0.
Sample segment 6: 6→7. Length 13. Walls crossed: 0.
Sample segment 7: 7→8. Length 4. Walls crossed: 0.
Sample segment 8: 8→9. Length 3. Walls crossed: 0.
Sample segment 9: 9→10. Length 5. Walls crossed: 0.
Sample segment 10: 10→11. Length 3. Walls crossed: 0.
Sample segment 11: 11→12. Length 2. Walls crossed: 0.
Sample segment 12: 12→13. Length 2. Walls crossed: 0.
Lab result: Checkpoint-cluster board. 36 cells. 0 walls. 1→2 (3 cells, R1C3→R1C1); 2→3 (3 cells, R1C1→R3C1); 3→4 (5 cells, R3C1→R5C3); 4→5 (2 cells, R5C3→R5C2); 5→6 (2 cells, R5C2→R5C1); 6→7 (13 cells, R5C1→R1C5); 7→8 (4 cells, R1C5→R2C3); 8→9 (3 cells, R2C3→R3C2); 9→10 (5 cells, R3C2→R5C4); 10→11 (3 cells, R5C4→R4C5); 11→12 (2 cells, R4C5→R3C5); 12→13 (2 cells, R3C5→R2C5).