Classification target LinkedIn Zip #494. Grid 7×7. Checkpoint count 12. Wall sample 0. Pattern tag: checkpoint-cluster board. Segment vector: 1→2 (2 cells), 2→3 (5 cells), 3→4 (11 cells), 4→5 (2 cells), 5→6 (6 cells), 6→7 (7 cells), 7→8 (6 cells), 8→9 (2 cells), 9→10 (11 cells), 10→11 (5 cells), 11→12 (2 cells).
Board spotlight: Checkpoints sit close together on the grid — short numbered hops still need full-cell coverage between them without revisiting squares. Wall count 0 on 7×7 shapes which corridors stay open between numbered cells.
Sample segment 1: 1→2. Length 2. Walls crossed: 0.
Sample segment 2: 2→3. Length 5. Walls crossed: 0.
Sample segment 3: 3→4. Length 11. Walls crossed: 0.
Sample segment 4: 4→5. Length 2. Walls crossed: 0.
Sample segment 5: 5→6. Length 6. Walls crossed: 0.
Sample segment 6: 6→7. Length 7. Walls crossed: 0.
Sample segment 7: 7→8. Length 6. Walls crossed: 0.
Sample segment 8: 8→9. Length 2. Walls crossed: 0.
Sample segment 9: 9→10. Length 11. Walls crossed: 0.
Sample segment 10: 10→11. Length 5. Walls crossed: 0.
Sample segment 11: 11→12. Length 2. Walls crossed: 0.
Lab result: Checkpoint-cluster board. 49 cells. 0 walls. 1→2 (2 cells, R3C5→R3C4); 2→3 (5 cells, R3C4→R1C2); 3→4 (11 cells, R1C2→R7C4); 4→5 (2 cells, R7C4→R7C5); 5→6 (6 cells, R7C5→R5C2); 6→7 (7 cells, R5C2→R3C6); 7→8 (6 cells, R3C6→R1C3); 8→9 (2 cells, R1C3→R1C4); 9→10 (11 cells, R1C4→R7C6); 10→11 (5 cells, R7C6→R5C4); 11→12 (2 cells, R5C4→R5C3).