Case file LinkedIn Zip #487: 8×8 path puzzle, 16 checkpoint exhibits, 0 blocked edges. Full trace covers 64 cells. Hop summary: 1→2 (4 cells, R5C6→R3C5); 2→3 (6 cells, R3C5→R6C7); 3→4 (4 cells, R6C7→R7C5); 4→5 (9 cells, R7C5→R5C7); 5→6 (2 cells, R5C7→R4C7); 6→7 (10 cells, R4C7→R2C6); 7→8 (2 cells, R2C6→R2C5); 8→9 (17 cells, R2C5→R7C4); 9→10 (2 cells, R7C4→R7C3); 10→11 (4 cells, R7C3→R5C2); 11→12 (2 cells, R5C2→R4C2); 12→13 (2 cells, R4C2→R4C3); 13→14 (4 cells, R4C3→R6C4); 14→15 (6 cells, R6C4→R3C2); 15→16 (4 cells, R3C2→R2C4).
Board spotlight: Checkpoints sit close together on the grid — short numbered hops still need full-cell coverage between them without revisiting squares. Wall count 0 on 8×8 shapes which corridors stay open between numbered cells.
Exhibit 1: 1→2, 4 cells. 4 cells link checkpoint 1 at R5C6 to checkpoint 2 at R3C5 with open corridors (no walls on this segment).
Exhibit 2: 2→3, 6 cells. 6 cells link checkpoint 2 at R3C5 to checkpoint 3 at R6C7 with open corridors (no walls on this segment).
Exhibit 3: 3→4, 4 cells. 4 cells link checkpoint 3 at R6C7 to checkpoint 4 at R7C5 with open corridors (no walls on this segment).
Exhibit 4: 4→5, 9 cells. 9 cells link checkpoint 4 at R7C5 to checkpoint 5 at R5C7 with open corridors (no walls on this segment).
Exhibit 5: 5→6, 2 cells. Tight 2-cell hop — checkpoints 5 and 6 sit near each other; still visit every intervening cell exactly once.
Exhibit 6: 6→7, 10 cells. 10 cells link checkpoint 6 at R4C7 to checkpoint 7 at R2C6 with open corridors (no walls on this segment).
Exhibit 7: 7→8, 2 cells. Tight 2-cell hop — checkpoints 7 and 8 sit near each other; still visit every intervening cell exactly once.
Exhibit 8: 8→9, 17 cells. 17 cells link checkpoint 8 at R2C5 to checkpoint 9 at R7C4 with open corridors (no walls on this segment).
Exhibit 9: 9→10, 2 cells. Tight 2-cell hop — checkpoints 9 and 10 sit near each other; still visit every intervening cell exactly once.
Exhibit 10: 10→11, 4 cells. 4 cells link checkpoint 10 at R7C3 to checkpoint 11 at R5C2 with open corridors (no walls on this segment).
Exhibit 11: 11→12, 2 cells. Tight 2-cell hop — checkpoints 11 and 12 sit near each other; still visit every intervening cell exactly once.
Exhibit 12: 12→13, 2 cells. Tight 2-cell hop — checkpoints 12 and 13 sit near each other; still visit every intervening cell exactly once.
Exhibit 13: 13→14, 4 cells. 4 cells link checkpoint 13 at R4C3 to checkpoint 14 at R6C4 with open corridors (no walls on this segment).
Exhibit 14: 14→15, 6 cells. 6 cells link checkpoint 14 at R6C4 to checkpoint 15 at R3C2 with open corridors (no walls on this segment).
Exhibit 15: 15→16, 4 cells. 4 cells link checkpoint 15 at R3C2 to checkpoint 16 at R2C4 with open corridors (no walls on this segment).
Verdict: 64-cell Hamiltonian path satisfies checkpoint order and wall constraints. Case closed.